A personal blog with political and firearms related content.
Recent posts:
AFP: Gun culture hard to beat in south Sudan
I wish I could find some thing to excerpt. The whole article illustrates the “problem” with gun control: the disarmed people get victimized, and the government can’t rule as it sees fit. The article is slanted towards the government that wants to provide roads and schools (as well as disarming the people), but the populace that has every reason to be distrustful of governments.
The politicians benefit. As the crime rate goes up the politicians get more of a mandate from the people to pass more laws, levy more taxes, and spend more money. The passage of a new law is equated as being “tough on crime” come election time, regardless of if a new has any effect on crime at all.
Here is a prime example:
…Democratic leaders said they will continue to build on a foundation of strong sex-crime policies, including involuntary civil commitments and tough criminal sentences.
…Lawmakers also pledged to put money behind their demands for increased police emphasis on sex offenders — something that hasn’t always been done in the past.
…The largest piece of sex-offender spending discussed Thursday is Gregoire’s request for a $5 million grant program to pay police to conduct in-person visits with sex offenders. Low-risk offenders would get annual checkups under the plan, with the highest-risk sex criminals being seen four times a year.
Instead of a jury trial for a crime, sex offenses can be reclassified as mental illness and the involentary civil commitment process can be used. Additionally I am not sure what an annual (or quarterly) police visit to a registered sex offenders home is going to do to prevent further offenses, but Washington state was considering spending $5 million on it.
If we look at the “war on drugs” we see a massive expansion of government control, imprisonment, asset forfeiture, and government spending. I do not know any other crimes where if convicted the government can seize your home, car, and financial assets and you are forced to sue to get them back.
The question is do any of these laws and policies make the citizens safer? No rational citizen wants sex offenders or drug dealers walking the streets, but if we allow the expansion of government control and continue to hand them a blank check to “do something” we rarely get what we were hoping for.
My prediction for the next round of gun control is that the crime rate will go up because of citizen disarmament and the cycle will continue. We know this is a failed policy. Look across the Atlantic you can see where this expansion of state power will ultimately lead.
Ellwood City Ledger – Code enforcement officers no longer carrying guns
When the gun policy was passed Aug. 19, city Administrator Steve Johnson said residents sometimes react badly when ordered to trim bushes or remove junk from their property.
“Some people get pretty irate,” he told The Times. “They think because it’s their property, they can do anything they want.”
On Tuesday, the motion to rescind the gun policy was unanimously approved without discussion, as was the policy
to approve pepper spray.
I point out this article because apparently it was though that telling people to clean up their yards was too dangerous to do unarmed. Is delivering an order to trim your bushes more dangerous than delivering a pizza? Somebody though that these government employees shouldn’t face that uncertainty unarmed. I don’t like to see people disarmed, but I also don’t like the state dolling out special privileges to it’s functionaries that are denied to it’s population.