
I have been carrying the G2 daily for a about a year. It is inexpensive and has good light output.
Tasers are great. They really do work, unlike “stun guns.” I have been shot with an M26 Taser and it was very painful and dropped me like a sack of potatoes. I think they are a great tool for law-enforcement, but are of much less value to private citizens.
Basically a taser shoots two barbed darts connected by thin wire leads that conduct the electrical current. The pair of darts have a deliberate offset so they will not have the same point of impact. Both darts need to hit the target in order to work. This is a little more challenging than the manufacturer would lead you to believe. The deliberate offset fires the second dart at a slight downward angle. If the taser is canted while firing then the second dart isn't as likely to hit. I cannot guarantee the orientation of a weapon in a self-defense fight.
Another major limitation is the short fifteen foot range. The Tueller drill has demonstrated that the average person can cover twenty-one feet in a little over a second. This means that you will need either a sub-second draw stroke with your taser, or you will need to have it drawn before the assailant begins to close. The safety mechanism on the weapon isn't what I would call ergonomic so I don't know how difficult it is to disengage. Don't misjudge the distance either, because the darts are stopped by the wire leads at fifteen feet.
You only get one chance to hit. Speed reloading the taser is not an option. The manufacturer requires that you register each cartridge and then they provide you with an activation code to arm the cartridge. You will get no practice firing the taser, since cartridges are $25.00 per shot, and you have to go through the activation process for each reload.
My next question is what happens after you get a successful hit. The manufacturer recommends that you set the taser down while the assailant is getting the 30 second jolt and run, and the manufacturer will replace your taser at no cost with a police report. That sounds like solid advice and a good policy, but what about multiple opponent encounters? We know from law enforcement statistics that many assaults on police officers involve multiple assailants. While the pattern of assaults on the police is different from that of victimization against private citizens, it is likely that there will be multiple attackers.
All of this leads me to conclude that while tasers are a great law-enforcement tool, it is of almost no utility for private citizens.
More information is available from the manufacturer at Taser International
Sebastian's blog is primarily focused on gun rights and politics. The commentary is always worth reading.
Link
Comments
If you miss the target or the assailant somehow gets to you, there is still the contact stun feature. Touching the assailant with the tip causes the taser to act like a stun gun. This of course assumes the user is calm enough to use this method. My guess is that most people aren't trained to deal with hostile situations and would just freak out. The answer appears to be proper training and preparation.
Regarding the multiple assailants, you just have to run and hope someone helps you. You can try the stun feature on any others and hopefully it will buy you enough time to run away.
The bottom line is to not put yourself in a situation where you might be harmed. This eliminates the need for a taser. If somewhere is dangerous, simply don't go there. Your life isn't worth it.
That is kind of my point. A taser is a good answer for closing with people and arresting them, it kind of falls apart for self-defense. I am all for not being in a bad situation, etc. but that isn't a realistic solution.
I have also carried a firearm
(professionally licensed by both states of California and Oregon)
As an officer of thirteen years of experience. Having all of these other tools on you when you are on duty is a way of not using your firearm as a last resort again, depending on the situation you are in.
As also for training you are at times expected to avoid such situations
by using prevention methods if necessary, depending on the situation.
Sometimes you have to take such risks because of others uncooperation.
If you carry a gun and you decide to run, what's the point?
Let's say this scenario; Say you are an officer and you are on duty.
You are performing your various duties on the job during whatever shift.
You get a call from dispatch saying there is a shooting going on in an apartment complex.
Witnesses's have verified this incident.
You arrive on the scene along with appropriate back-up.
Let's say when you arrive the suspects start shooting at you, are you going to run??
What would you do? What would be the appropriate action to take
when you are dealing with a high stress situation and you had to make a split second decision based on someone's life who is in danger??
Like I said before I am going to run in all situations where I am able to do so. Abandoning someone I care about would be a situation where I wasn't able to do so.
Not being a sworn law enforcement officer I do not have any extra legal protections for shooting people. I don't have a scenario where I am 'on duty' and my job is to arrest people. I have said that a taser is great for arresting people, if those people are shooting at you then the taser isn't the right tool for the job.
Law enforcement tools such as Tasers, pepper spray & batons;
Officers are trained & certified to use these as a last resort to a certain extent,
from the firearm in a unique challenging case scenario.