The Top 10 Self Defense Myths

Posted by – November 4, 2008

Boob Attack!
The internet is full of “common sense” tips, regurgitating the same old information with out any real analysis or insight. I suspect that many of these tips originated from police departments who didn’t want to go on record as endorsing active resistance or private citizens being armed. As these tips continue to make the rounds they become more like dogma, and less like doctrine.

1. You can be disarmed and the weapon used against you.
This is true, but only likely if you have a weapon you aren’t willing to use. Criminals don’t have some special weapon disarming skills, and disarms are not trivial. You don’t see ‘disarm the criminal’ on any fast and easy self-defense list. The assailant might have a belief that you are bluffing. Prove them wrong.

Competent, confident weapons handling is a weapons retention skill. If you look like you know what you are doing attempting a disarm won’t seem to be a very attractive option.

2. Common Items can be used as weapons
While this is true, unless the common item in question is in hand at the time this probably irrelevant. Fishing around in a handbag for pen or a hairbrush to fight with isn’t a very practical strategy. Weapons can be used as weapons too, that is what they were designed for. Improvisation is inferior to having a plan and the proper tools.

3. Use your keys as a weapon
Jabbing with your keys might scratch the attacker, but it will also hurt your hand, and in many cases cause you to drop your keys. I agree with having the keys you need handy for unlocking the door you need to open, but I would skip using the keys as a weapon.

4. Scratch your attacker to mark him
The scratch will make him easily identifiable, and the police can get his DNA from your finger nails. The problem is that this will be helpful in catching and convicting the assailant after the fact. I am sure the police can get DNA from a rape kit too, but it as a preventative measure this falls flat.

5. Don’t walk alone
This is true, but it makes a lot of assumptions. This assumes that your companion is going to be useful in confrontation. That companion can turn into a liability really quickly if they don’t know when to shut up, when to fight, and when to run.

“Don’t walk alone” also assumes that the potential assailant is deterred by there being more than one person. This might be true for crimes like rape, but for robbery and assaults it is much less of a deterrent. If the attacker is armed he might decide that he is more than a match for you and your companion.

The “don’t walk alone rule” is generally only effective if you are bringing what amounts to a bodyguard, otherwise you are bringing a witness or worst case, a second victim. It might be effective against some criminal encounters, but it is an encumbrance in others.

6. Avoid dark places
This is probably not practical in the real world. Almost as many crimes (with the exception of sexual assaults) happen in broad daylight as they do at night. What we are concerned about is not seeing the problem before the problem sees us. Secluded areas can be dangerous regardless of the lighting conditions. Areas that provide good hiding places, channelize movement, or are isolated from the public make good locations for ambush.

7. Tell someone where you are going and when you will be back
There is nothing wrong with this, but I don’t see this a being useful for anything other than helping with the investigation of your disappearance. Even if the police were to be called (because you were late or didn’t arrive) they only know the end-points of your route, not the route itself.

8. The Gross-Out Defense
There are a number of variations on this theme: bad smelling liquids, soiling yourself, etc. I have even seen it once recommended that you put a finger down your throat and induce vomiting. All of this is stupid. It presupposes a lot about the attacker and his motivation for the victimization. None of these tricks do anything to improve your mobility or reduce the assailants ability to harm you.

9. Noise Makers
I see a lot mention of personal alarms, and whistles. The idea is that you will attract the attention of someone who can intervene for you, or that the assailant will leave because he is afraid of witnesses. I think these devices are wishful thinking. The time spent deploying one of these would be better spent creating distance, getting a real (or even improvised) weapon, and injuring the attacker.

10. Groin Strikes.
The groin strike has to be the most common self-defense technique since every tips list seems to cover it. The problem is that even if you strike with enough force to actually rupture something the effects of that are minutes away. Most men will have been hit in the groin a few times in their lives and are pretty good at protecting it. A groin strike can be painful, but it can also be ignored. Most men who have played sports have been hit in the groin and still finished the play.

  • It pays to be prepared for such situations. Martial arts training and something you can use as a weapon will really help. I'm also having a little difficulty believing you don't believe in the groin strike.

  • Kardsh

    I really have problems with the fact that you make a myth out of a groin-strike. To be honest, this almost makes me doubt your knowledge on the subject. What you say is true: some men are used to it - but this does not mean its any less effective.
    The groin-strike is a great shock-weapon - its just natural reflex to bend over when striken in the groin (you may try if you want;D). That leaves them in a very vurnable position. After giving a blow with your elbow to the back of the neck, the attacker won't bother to follow you.

    But the best thing is, just give the guy that $10.

  • @Kardsh: Doubt whatever you like. There is no physiological reason that a groin strike is going to stop an assailant. It's painful, but it's not a fight ender if the assailant is motivated. The time you are spending on striking a non-vital target is time you are wasting. I throw groin strikes in a few situations, but not because it's a great target.

  • Hear_No_Evil

    For the record, a man hyped up on adrenaline, drugs, or other substances will not react to the groin strike.

    And as much as little girls are taught to strike the groin... I guarantee that little boys are taught to protect it. The element of surprise is not in the groin strike.

  • Re: #9, An M1911A1 makes one hell of a loud noise. Just sayin'...

  • @ Warriorforjesus:

    “#7 - In the ‘real world’ keeping in touch by mobile phones from time to time, especially where it applies to wives and children, may well save a life. A broken down car or flat tire on a remote road can easily turn out to be a life threatening circumstance. Without ‘touching in’ now and again, someone could find themselves in desperate times.”

    Having a “no comm plan” is not a bad idea in general, but it will not save someone in a self defense context. It is mostly for the peace of mind of the “higher headquarters”. The loss of communication or missing a scheduled check in sets into motion a plan of action which will take time to implement. In the meantime, your loved one is on their own. Given that it only takes seconds to abduct or murder someone, this is not very useful to the person actually under attack at that moment. Any plan that is completely dependent on someone else to arrive in the nick of time is a bad plan. Case in point: Kelsey Smith. She called her parents just moments before she was abducted, raped and murdered. Her cell phone signal was used, not to rescue her, but to locate her body.

    "#9 - Noise makers such as a loud whistle is very effective to bring people’s attention to the exact inch of land where you happen to be standing at the time. Evil people such as a rapist do the evil they do in the dark where they are not noticed by others. The last thing such a person wants is to have a parking lot of people able to ID them in Court."

    No, the last thing a rapist wants is to be killed. You are making a large number of flawed assumptions about the nature of a deadly attack, the utility of a whistle and the role of eyewitnesses in a deadly encounter. I will once again point to the Kelsey Smith case. The rapist/murderer didn't want to do his evil in the parking lot, that is why he took her to a secluded location where a whistle would be even more useless. There were numerous cameras, inside the store and in the parking lot, that actually filmed her abduction. The cameras helped to ID the bad guy, but in reality they had no deterrent effect on the crime (i.e. Kelsey Smith was still attacked and killed).

    “From my years of military experience, I have found a whistle much easier to carry then a gun and is non-lethal to boot."

    Which army did you serve in where soldiers were issued whistles instead of rifles? There is absolutely no reason to use a non-lethal device to defend against a deadly threat. In fact, doing so is tantamount to suicide.

    “Blow a whistle as hard as you can in a large parking lot full of people or in a warehouse and you will instantly become the number one ‘item’ of interest. And yes, lots of people will be able to ID you in Court."

    Numerous real, documented incidents contradict your assumptions and assertions, most notably the Kitty Genovese murder, which is commonly used as a prime example of the bystander effect. Granted, she didn't use a whistle, but I think my point is still valid. Also, eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable and besides all that, none of this solves the immediate problem of the person being attacked (namely,that they are being attacked with deadly force). Blow a whistle as hard as you can while someone is choking, punching, stabbing or shooting you and you will instantly realize that tooting on your whistle and the disapproving gaze of bystanders will not reliably stop fists, knives and bullets. And yes, some people might be able to ID you in the morgue.

    Warriorforjesus: “I have provided everyone in my family with a whistle as their number one determent. The whistle declares your exact position and stuns anyone near you enough to attack you, and hopefully provides the time needed to get away without having to pull out a concealed weapon and shoot them.

    A whistle is not a deterrent. It does not discourage or restrain a vicious criminal from acting or proceeding with an evil act of violence. It does not confer upon the owner any strength or ability to defend or retaliate strongly enough to deter a criminal from attacking.

    Please show me any proof that a whistle is capable of “stunning” an attacker. Actually, show me any documented instance where a whistle prevented an abduction, rape or murder. You seem to be more concerned about the safety and welfare of the evil kidnapper/rapist/murderer than you are of your own family. I suggest you study up on the use of force and the force continuum.

    I do think whistles can be useful in a non-tactical setting. I keep one in my wilderness survival kit for signaling a search party if I am ever stranded in the woods. That is a far cry from fending off kidnappers, rapists and murderers.

  • I have a few 'personal' comments that I would like to share -

    #6 - Many experts say that the majority of attacks are committed at dusk or in the night, and in my personal life experiences, dark places are where evil people hide. I cannot see any scenario where I would tell my wife, daughters or myself not to be excessively cautious of dark areas.

    #7 - Years ago I happened to be a Flight Control Officer sending out Army helicopters in every direction on a continuous basis. I pre-approved all flight plans and knew exactly where every crew was from take off until final touch down. In a few instances this information saved the lives of a crew when they happened to crash in desperate circumstances. As I kept watch over their flight plans, I instantly knew if they happened to be in a potentially dangerous situation.

    In the 'real world' keeping in touch by mobile phones from time to time, especially where it applies to wives and children, may well save a life. A broken down car or flat tire on a remote road can easily turn out to be a life threatening circumstance. Without 'touching in' now and again, someone could find themselves in desperate times. My wife for example, has chosen on her own accord to be sure to call me before she leaves work day or night. I know how long it takes her to reach home and the roads she drives. If she does not pull in the drive way within reasonable time, or does not call me, I know where to go looking for her in case she could be in some form of trouble.

    #9 - Noise makers such as a loud whistle is very effective to bring people's attention to the exact inch of land where you happen to be standing at the time. Evil people such as a rapist do the evil they do in the dark where they are not noticed by others. The last thing such a person wants is to have a parking lot of people able to ID them in Court. From my years of military experience, I have found a whistle much easier to carry then a gun and is non-lethal to boot. Blow a whistle as hard as you can in a large parking lot full of people or in a warehouse and you will instantly become the number one 'item' of interest. And yes, lots of people will be able to ID you in Court. I have provided everyone in my family with a whistle as their number one determent. The whistle declares your exact position and stuns anyone near you enough to attack you, and hopefully provides the time needed to get away without having to pull out a concealed weapon and shoot them.

    These sentences are my opinion based on my 'personal' experience and not paragraphs taken from my or anyone else's book, the operative word happens to be 'personal'.

blog comments powered by Disqus